State v. Pacific
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 4779
Syllabus
The jury's verdict did not represent a manifest miscarriage of justice because although there was no direct evidence that the defendant was the driver that led police on a high-speed chase, the circumstantial evidence presented at trial was overwhelming upon arriving at the residence registered to the vehicle involved in the chase, the defendant was found walking away from the vehicle, fled on foot upon being approached by police, and was subsequently apprehended in the residence's attic.
Judges: Hendrickson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
- Eastley v. VolkmanOhio Supreme Court· 2012-05-22· cited 2,407×
- State v. McKnightOhio Supreme Court· 2005-11-30· cited 390×
- State v. HeinishOhio Supreme Court· 1990-04-25· cited 259×
- State v. StringerOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-03-18· cited 18×
- State v. ReederOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-08-30· cited 13×
- State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-06-13· cited 8×
- State v. WallaceOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-05-08· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.