Skip to main content
· 11/20/1996

Bride v. Heckart

Citations

  • 556 N.W.2d 449
  • 1996 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 442
  • 1996 WL 668296

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • relying on a prior interpretation of the language in the prior version of rule 51:2.11(A)
  • relying on a prior interpretation of the language in the prior version of rule 51:2.11(A)
  • “The submission of instructions upon issues that have no support in the evidence is error.” (citation omitted)
  • “The judge should have known that, based on his recent, prior representation by defense counsel’s law firm, a party in plaintiff’s position might question his impartiality.”
  • appeal based on a trial judge’s failure to disclose a possible basis for disqualification
  • appeal based on a trial judge’s failure to disclose a possible basis for disqualification

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McGiverin, Harris, Neuman, Andreasen, Ternus

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.