Skip to main content

State v. Madden

Citations

  • 2022 Ohio 2638

Syllabus

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW/CRIMINAL – MIRANDA: The trial court did not err in granting defendant's motion to suppress statements he made during a police interview where defendant asked for an attorney three times and police officers continued to make statements calculated to elicit an incriminating statement, and where the prosecution failed to meet its burden to show that defendant voluntarily reinitiated dialogue and voluntarily waived his rights.

Judges: Winkler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.