Skip to main content

State v. Mack

Citations

  • 197 Conn. 629
  • 500 A.2d 1303
  • 1985 Conn. LEXIS 939

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting challenge to such instructions as “ ‘totally without merit’ ”
  • “[a court’s] comments or questions for the purpose of clarifying . . . testimony are permissible and often necessary”
  • \[a court's] comments or questions for the purpose of clarifying ... testimony are permissible and often necessary\
  • “[a court’s] comments or questions for the purpose of clarifying . . . testimony are permissible and often necessary”
  • no abuse of discretion where court’s questions “can reasonably be viewed as intended to clear up a possible misunderstanding by the jury”
  • the court was convinced that the evidence of the guilt was overwhelming where the defendant was recognized during the course of the robbery by victims who knew him

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shea

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.