Skip to main content
Ohio Supreme Court· 6/24/1998

State v. Mack

Citations

  • 82 Ohio St. 3d 198
  • 694 N.E.2d 1328

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Fear alone is insufficient to demonstrate the kind of emotional state necessary to constitute sudden passion or fit of rage.”
  • “Fear alone is insufficient to demonstrate the kind of emotional state necessary to constitute sudden passion or [a] fit of rage”
  • “Fear alone is insufficient to demonstrate the kind of emotional state necessary to constitute sudden passion or fit of rage”
  • “Fear alone is insufficient to demonstrate the kind of emotional state necessary to constitute sudden passion or fit of rage.”
  • “Fear alone is insufficient to demonstrate the kind of emotional state necessary to constitute sudden passion or [a] fit of rage.”
  • \Fear alone is insufficient to demonstrate the kind of emotional state necessary to constitute sudden passion or fit of rage.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

106 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named State v. Mack

172 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.