State v. MacK

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• distinguishing allegations relating to subcategory of the crime charged, which a jury must find beyond a reasonable doubt, from aggravating and mitigating factors, which a sentencing court may take into account to justify departures from a presumptive sentence
• the defendant was not entitled to present evidence of mitigating factors to jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Sawatzky
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-09-08· cited 18×
• State v. Casavan
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-03-13· cited 7×
• State v. Kreimeyer
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-10-14

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Moeller
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-02-06· cited 84×
• State v. Moeller
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1991-08-29· cited 81×