Skip to main content
Ohio Supreme Court· 8/24/2011

State v. Barker

Citations

  • 2011 Ohio 4130
  • 129 Ohio St. 3d 472

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding when a trial court addresses all the constitutional rights in the oral colloquy, a reviewing court is permitted to consider additional record evidence to reconcile any alleged ambiguity in it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stratton, O'Connor, Pfeifer, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, Brown

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

119 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.