State v. Lovelace
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 339
Syllabus
The trial court did not err in denying appellant's motion to dismiss on speedy trial grounds where the trial court properly placed on the record and journalized its reasons for the sua sponte continuance of nine days due to its crowded docket. Further, appellant's conviction was not against the manifest weight of the evidence, and was thus supported by sufficient evidence, where the jury heard testimony from three witnesses that had ample opportunity to see and identify the appellant as the driver of the vehicle.
Judges: M. Powell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. TaylorOhio Supreme Court· 2002-12-20· cited 176×
- State v. LeeOhio Supreme Court· 1976-12-15· cited 162×
- State v. WentworthOhio Supreme Court· 1978-05-03· cited 57×
- City of Aurora v. PatrickOhio Supreme Court· 1980-01-30· cited 47×
- State v. RedelmanOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-02-25· cited 14×
- State v. RobersonOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-10-18· cited 13×
- State v. CephasOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-12-13· cited 11×
- State v. JividenOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-08-09· cited 9×
- State v. EnochOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-06-22· cited 8×
- State v. StodgelOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-03-25· cited 5×
- State v. WilsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-02-26· cited 5×
- State v. BostickOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-11-28· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.