Skip to main content

State v. Lovelace

Citations

  • 2023 Ohio 339

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in denying appellant's motion to dismiss on speedy trial grounds where the trial court properly placed on the record and journalized its reasons for the sua sponte continuance of nine days due to its crowded docket. Further, appellant's conviction was not against the manifest weight of the evidence, and was thus supported by sufficient evidence, where the jury heard testimony from three witnesses that had ample opportunity to see and identify the appellant as the driver of the vehicle.

Judges: M. Powell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.