State v. Wilson
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 702
- 106 N.E.3d 767
Syllabus
Appellant's conviction for speeding was supported by sufficient evidence and the trial court did not err in finding the laser speed-measuring device scientifically reliable after taking judicial notice of previously heard expert testimony. Further, appellant's statutory speedy-trial rights were not violated as the time to bring appellant to trial was extended by appellant's request for discovery.
Judges: Hendrickson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
- State v. KingOhio Supreme Court· 1994-08-31· cited 342×
- State v. BrownOhio Supreme Court· 2002-12-23· cited 211×
- State v. TaylorOhio Supreme Court· 2002-12-20· cited 176×
- State v. SanchezOhio Supreme Court· 2006-09-13· cited 143×
- State v. SaffellOhio Supreme Court· 1988-02-03· cited 136×
- State v. GrinsteadOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-06-20· cited 120×
- State v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-03-11· cited 15×
- State v. BolesOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-03-06· cited 12×
- State v. StarksOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-05-16· cited 12×
- State v. KincaidMorrow County Circuit Court, Oregon· 2003-08-05· cited 11×
- State v. SchusterOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-11-23· cited 6×
- State v. SweatOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-04-25· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.