Skip to main content

State v. Wilson

Citations

  • 2018 Ohio 702
  • 106 N.E.3d 767

Syllabus

Appellant's conviction for speeding was supported by sufficient evidence and the trial court did not err in finding the laser speed-measuring device scientifically reliable after taking judicial notice of previously heard expert testimony. Further, appellant's statutory speedy-trial rights were not violated as the time to bring appellant to trial was extended by appellant's request for discovery.

Judges: Hendrickson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.