Skip to main content
Ohio Supreme Court· 12/15/1976

State v. Lee

Citations

  • 48 Ohio St. 2d 208
  • 357 N.E.2d 1095
  • 2 Ohio Op. 3d 392
  • 1976 Ohio LEXIS 736

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • The reasonableness of a continuance is determined by examining the purpose and length of the continuance.
  • “[t]he record of the trial court must in some manner affirmatively demonstrate that a sua sponte continuance by the court was reasonable in light of its necessity or purpose”
  • “The record of the trial court must in some manner affirmatively demonstrate that a sua sponte continuance by the court was reasonable in light of its necessity or purpose.”
  • “The record of the trial court must in some manner affirmatively demonstrate that a sua sponte continuance by the court was reasonable in light of its necessity or purpose.”
  • continuance due to \crowded docket & judge's conference\ was reasonable
  • dealing with speedy-trial rights and continuances

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown, Celebrezze, Corrigan, Herbert, Neill, Stern

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

80 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.