Idaho Supreme Court· 4/22/2004

State v. Lovelace

Citations

90 P.3d 298
140 Idaho 73
2004 Ida. LEXIS 62

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

discussing impact of Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584, 122 S.Ct. 2428, 153 L.Ed.2d 556 (2002), on Idaho capital-sentencing procedures
distinguishing cases where a judge imposes the sentence from the case in Lovelace where the impact statements were presented to a jury
distinguishing cases where a judge imposes the sentence from the case in Lovelace where the impact statements were presented to a jury
\We conclude that there is no double jeopardy bar to imposition of the death penalty on Lovelace's sentencing following vacation of his original death sentence.\
this portion of the holding was not relevant to the issues decided on rehearing
defendant failed to demonstrate that investigator was necessary to adequate defense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burdick, Trout, Schroeder, Kidwell, Eismann

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.