State v. Deisz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where the district court ruled the statement was admissible only as victim input and then set forth multiple reasons for Deisz’s sentence based on the proper sentencing factors, there was no error
• holding that where the district court ruled the statement was admissible only as victim input and then set forth multiple reasons for Deisz’s sentence based on 5 the proper sentencing factors, there was no error
• “Even if [the defendant’s] actions were reasonable and could support a meritorious self-defense argument at trial, the exclusionary rule would not require suppression of evidence of the shooting prior to trial based on a self-defense theory.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).