State v. Long

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Where criminal conduct violates both a special and a more general statute, courts generally assume the Legislature intended that the accused be charged only under the special statute.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• State v. Montejano
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2008-12-11· cited 5×

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Wilbur L. LOVELACE, Appellant, v. SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY, Appellee
  Fourth Circuit· 1982-06-15· cited 427×
• State v. Knapstad
  Washington Supreme Court· 1986-12-04· cited 257×
• State v. Leech
  Washington Supreme Court· 1990-05-03· cited 112×
• United States v. Edmonson
  Ninth Circuit· 1986-07-01· cited 81×
• State v. Shriner
  Washington Supreme Court· 1984-05-17· cited 71×
• California v. Federal Communications Commission
  Ninth Circuit· 1990-06-06· cited 40×
• State v. Williams
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1991-09-09· cited 33×
• State v. Walker
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1994-07-25· cited 17×
• State v. Jendrey
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1986-12-29· cited 8×
• State v. Aitken
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1995-11-30· cited 8×
• State v. Datin
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1986-10-21· cited 7×
• State v. Quigley
  Washington Supreme Court· 1958-04-24· cited 7×
• Zanetta v. Bolles
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1907-10-16· cited 5×