Skip to main content

State v. Aitken

Citations

  • 905 P.2d 1235
  • 79 Wash. App. 890

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a bank withdrawal slip was a \written instrument\ within the meaning of the forgery statute and upholding the defendant's forgery conviction as against an evidentiary sufficiency challenge, where the evidence was that the defendant signed a false name to a bank withdrawal slip

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Morgan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.