Skip to main content

State v. Addison

Citations

  • 2024 Ohio 5805

Syllabus

Motion for leave; motion for a new trial; Crim.R. 33(A)(6); Crim.R. 33(B); \unavoidably prevented\; newly discovered evidence; clear and convincing evidence; abuse of discretion; Crime Stoppers; Brady material; recantation; recusal; disqualification. Judgment affirmed. The trial court did not abuse its discretion when it denied appellant's motion for leave to file a motion for a new trial. Appellant failed to show by clear and convincing evidence that he was unavoidably prevented from discovering the information in a timely manner. Furthermore, the trial judge properly recused himself from the matter.

Judges: Boyle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.