Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2/6/2006
State v. Miller
Citations
- 626 S.E.2d 328
- 367 S.C. 329
- 2006 S.C. LEXIS 32
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that an error is harmless when it could not reasonably have affected the result of the trial
- explaining that an error is harmless when it could not reasonably have affected the result of the trial
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moore, Toal, Burnett, Pleicones, Thomas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ClausellSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1990-08-30· cited 132×
- State v. ReevesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1990-03-19· cited 75×
- State v. MizzellSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-04-29· cited 62×
- State v. McKnightSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-01-12· cited 54×
- People v. BisogniCalifornia Supreme Court· 1971-04-22· cited 33×
- State v. SimmonsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-04-27· cited 21×
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-06-28· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.