State v. Litteral
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 2092
Syllabus
The trial court committed plain error in its calculation of jail-time credit in two cases. The judgments of conviction are reversed only as to the jail-time credit calculations and remanded for the trial court to 1) issue nunc pro tunc judgment entries that credit appellant with proper amounts of jail-time credit and 2) notify the appropriate prison officials of the nunc pro tunc judgment entries. In all other respects, judgments affirmed.
Judges: Lewis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
- State v. LongOhio Supreme Court· 1978-02-15· cited 3,848×
- State v. HillOhio Supreme Court· 2001-07-05· cited 405×
- State v. FugateOhio Supreme Court· 2008-03-06· cited 209×
- State ex rel. Rankin v. Ohio Adult Parole AuthorityOhio Supreme Court· 2003-05-07· cited 113×
- State v. NapierOhio Supreme Court· 2001-12-19· cited 77×
- State v. DavisOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-10-12· cited 10×
- State v. SteinmetzOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-03-27· cited 10×
- State v. WoodwardOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-02-17· cited 8×
- State v. OgletreeOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-11-13· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.