State v. Ackerman
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 4966
Syllabus
Conceded error. The trial court failed to specify at appellant's sentencing hearing the total number of days of jail-time credit to which she was entitled or to provide her an opportunity to be heard on the issue. The trial court further failed to provide at the sentencing hearing all the notifications set forth in R.C. 2929.19(B)(2)(c) in connection with its imposition of an indefinite prison sentence under the Reagan Tokes Law. Judgment is reversed in part and remanded solely for the trial court to specify the total number of days of jail-time credit to which appellant was entitled as of the date of her sentencing; to allow appellant the opportunity to be heard on the issue of jail-time credit; and to properly advise her of the notifications set forth in R.C. 2929.19(B)(2)(c). Judgment affirmed in all other respects.
Judges: Huffman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court· 1970-11-23· cited 9,465×
- State v. WorthenOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-08-13· cited 45×
- State v. FarraOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-04-29· cited 39×
- State v. ThompsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-11-12· cited 35×
- State v. MassieOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-09-24· cited 30×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-08-19· cited 15×
- State v. DearmondOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-09-16· cited 10×
- State v. ThompsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-06-20· cited 5×
- State v. LitteralOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-05-31· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.