Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1/11/2017
State v. Chesnut
Citations
- 283 Or. App. 347
- 388 P.3d 1237
- 2017 Ore. App. LEXIS 41
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- declining to exercise discretion to correct plain error in a judgment when the defendant was consulted about the form of the judgment and was given the opportunity to raise any concerns
- declining to exercise discretion to correct what appeared to be a clerical error where the error easily could have been avoided if the defendant had raised the issue below and also was the type of error that easily could be corrected under ORS 138.083
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Devore, Duncan, Garrett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court· 1991-12-12· cited 1,060×
- State v. FultsOregon Supreme Court· 2007-12-13· cited 218×
- State v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-06-23· cited 33×
- State v. LewisOregon Supreme Court· 2010-10-07· cited 17×
- State v. LEPIERRECourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-06-02· cited 10×
- State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-08-07· cited 8×
- State v. DelgadoCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-12-15· cited 6×
- State v. PassCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-08-13· cited 6×
- Holloway v. GowerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-01-07· cited 5×
- State v. SkaggsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-12-16· cited 4×
- State v. HIEU DOAN TRUONGCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-03-28· cited 3×
- State v. RudnickCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-12-31· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.