State v. Leniart
Citations
- 333 Conn. 88
Syllabus
The defendant, who was convicted of capital felony and murder following the disappearance of the victim, appealed from the judgment of conviction, claiming, inter alia, that certain evidentiary rulings substantially affected the jury's verdict and that there was insufficient evidence to sustain his conviction under the common-law corpus delicti rule. At trial, the state presented testimony from A, who had been serving a ten year sentence for a sexual assault involving another victim at the time of the defendant's trial. A testified that he and the defendant had sexually assaulted the victim, a fifteen year old girl, after the three had driven to a secluded wooded location in the defendant's truck. A testified that he last saw the victim in the defendant's truck and that, when he met the defendant the following day, the defendant, who was a lobster fisherman, had confessed to killing the victim, placing her remains in a lobster trap, and dropping the trap into a river. In order to impeach A's credibility, The listing of justices reflects their seniority status on this court as of the date of oral argument. 333 Conn. 88 SEPTEMBER, 2019 89 State v. Leniart the defendant sought to admit a video recording depicting a police officer interviewing A prior to the administration of a polygraph examina- tion. The defendant claimed that the video was relevant because it showed that A had been promised favorable treatment in exchange for his cooperation. The trial court, however, excluded the video on the ground that it constituted inadmissible polygraph evidence under State v. Porter (241 Conn. 57). The state also presented testimony from three individuals who previously had been incarcerated with the defendant. The first of those witnesses, B, testified that the defendant had admitted to choking an intoxicated young girl to death while having sex with her, dismembering her body, and disposing of it in lobster pots in Long Island Sound. The second of those witnesses, D, testifi
Judges: Palmer; McDonald; Robinson; D’Auria; Mullins; Kahn; Vertefeuille
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
67 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1978-06-14· cited 4,912×
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-12-19· cited 2,736×
- McDuff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-01-22· cited 1,412×
- Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1954-12-06· cited 1,280×
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1973-06-05· cited 917×
- Connecticut v. PorterSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-05-20· cited 268×
- Warszower v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1941-02-17· cited 200×
- State of Tennessee v. Courtney BishopTennessee Supreme Court· 2014-03-06· cited 196×
- State v. SpigaroloSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-03-14· cited 159×
- State v. WaltonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-08-03· cited 157×
- United States v. Martha L. WoodsFourth Circuit· 1973-09-12· cited 152×
- State v. SaucierSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-07-17· cited 151×
- Adams v. United States District Court for the Northern District of CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1997-10-06· cited 142×
- State v. AdamsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-03-30· cited 133×
- State v. GoochSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-01-05· cited 117×
- People v. KonradMichigan Supreme Court· 1995-07-19· cited 115×
- State v. BorrelliSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-08-10· cited 105×
- United States v. Daryl E. SingleterryFirst Circuit· 1994-07-18· cited 91×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.