Supreme Court of Connecticut· 5/18/1999

State v. Lemon

Citations

248 Conn. 652
731 A.2d 271
1999 Conn. LEXIS 134

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

declining to consider state constitutional claim concerning commentary on right to testify because \the defendant cannot prevail even under the ... test that she advocates\
declining to consider state constitutional claim concerning commentary on right to testify because ‘‘the defendant cannot prevail even under the . . . test that she advocates’’
‘‘we consistently have applied the ‘naturally and necessarily’ test in resolving claims of improper prosecutorial com- ment on the defendant’s failure to testify’’
lack of objection to statements later challenged on appeal is evidence that counsel did not deem statements to be prejudicial when they were made
lack of objec- tion to statements later challenged on appeal is evi- dence that counsel did not deem statements to be prejudicial when they were made
established wisdom counsels against unnecessary determinations of constitutional questions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McDonald, Palmer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

70 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.