Court of Appeals of Maryland· 12/20/2001
Smith v. State
Citations
- 787 A.2d 152
- 367 Md. 348
- 2001 Md. LEXIS 947
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the prosecutor’s comment during closing argument violated Article 22 of the Maryland Declaration of Rights
- noting that “the crucial question is not the prosecutor’s intent” when analyzing prosecutorial comments on a defendant’s exercise of the Fifth Amendment privilege
- explaining that in our criminal justice system, the burden rests with the State to mount a case against a defendant; the defendant is under no obligation to help the State in this process
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Raker, Battaglia
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State of Tennessee v. Noura JacksonTennessee Supreme Court· 2014-08-22· cited 124×
- Gray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-04-11· cited 53×
- State of Maine v. Jomo WhiteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2022-11-08· cited 18×
- Whiting v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2004-12-23· cited 15×
- Marshall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2010-07-27· cited 14×
- Molina v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2019-12-23· cited 10×
- Alther v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2004-06-08· cited 9×
- Simpson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2015-04-07· cited 9×
- Choate v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-09-09· cited 8×
- State v. KEESECKERWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2008-06-27· cited 6×
- Walls v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2016-07-27· cited 6×
- Molter v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2011-09-07· cited 5×
- Herrington v. Red Run Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2002-12-03· cited 5×
- Warren v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-05-02· cited 2×
- Simpson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-09-25· cited 2×
- Frazier v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2011-02-03· cited 1×
- Harriston v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2020-06-01
- State of Tennessee v. Rebecca M. DavisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 2025-11-10
Cites
86 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1965-04-28· cited 4,680×
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1965-06-07· cited 4,088×
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1886-02-01· cited 3,820×
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court· 1964-06-15· cited 3,675×
- Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1993-06-01· cited 3,512×
- State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida· 1986-07-17· cited 2,703×
- United States v. HastingSupreme Court· 1983-05-23· cited 1,999×
- Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court· 1964-06-15· cited 1,503×
- Booth v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1987-09-21· cited 1,501×
- Mitchell v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1999-04-05· cited 802×
- Dorsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-01-09· cited 660×
- United States v. Alberto CalderonEleventh Circuit· 1997-11-14· cited 555×
- Wilhelm v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1974-09-26· cited 259×
- In re ShewchunSupreme Court· 1986-06-02· cited 231×
- United States v. Joseph Pitre Edwyn Pitre Angel M. Otero Richard PitreSecond Circuit· 1992-03-30· cited 228×
- Rodriguez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-02-03· cited 222×
- Degren v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-01-14· cited 158×
- People v. NealIllinois Supreme Court· 1985-12-20· cited 146×
- Ex Parte LogginsSupreme Court of Alabama· 2000-06-02· cited 142×
- United States v. Charles Edward McIntyreTenth Circuit· 1993-08-18· cited 140×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.