State v. Lee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[M]ovements by occupants in a stopped car will not always give rise to a reasonable officer-safety concern sufficient to justify a search or seizure.\
• vehicle occupant moving around, reaching to his side, and, despite deputy’s instruction, reaching down to the floorboard
• first brackets in original; parentheses and internal quotation marks omitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Davis
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-12-07· cited 14×
• State v. Bailey
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-12-09· cited 11×
• State v. Nye
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-01-03· cited 8×
• State v. Wilson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-02-23· cited 4×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Ehly
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-07-01· cited 660×
• State v. Hall
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2005-07-15· cited 336×
• State v. Bates
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1987-12-22· cited 243×
• State v. Amaya
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2004-04-29· cited 110×
• State v. Rudder
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2009-09-17· cited 22×
• State v. Amell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-08-12· cited 17×
• State v. Foster
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2009-09-17· cited 15×
• State v. Peterson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-09-18· cited 15×
• State v. Morgan
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2010-05-13· cited 14×
• State v. Hannaford
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-12-26· cited 4×
• State v. Haney
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-01-13· cited 3×