Court of Appeals of Oregon· 12/9/2020

State v. Bailey

Citations

307 Or. App. 782
479 P.3d 304

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that “a defendant’s compliant behavior may play a significant role in our determination of whether officer-safety concerns justify a search”
noting that, though not dispositive, “a defendant’s compliant behavior may play a significant role in our determination of whether officer- safety concerns justify a search”
“[T]he mere fact that a person possesses a weapon does not, per se, render officer-safety concerns objectively reasonable.”
“the mere fact that a per- son possesses a weapon does not, per se, render officer-safety concerns objectively reasonable”
rec- ognizing that “a defendant’s compliant behavior may play a significant role in our determination of whether officer- safety concerns justify a search”
“where a defendant cooper- ates with police, in the absence of any threatening behav- ior by the defendant, generalized safety concerns * * * are insufficient to justify an officer[-]safety search”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: DeHoog

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.