Wisconsin Supreme Court· 6/28/1985
State v. Leach
Citations
- 370 N.W.2d 240
- 124 Wis. 2d 648
- 1985 Wisc. LEXIS 2410
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding on de novo review that joinder was improper because the commonality between the cases was “insufficient to warrant the introduction of ‘other [acts]’ evidence”
- juries may not be left to “speculat[e],” “conjecture,” or “theorize” as to an ultimate fact based on a “mere possibility” (citation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Steinmetz, Abrahamson, Bablitch
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. PitschWisconsin Supreme Court· 1985-06-28· cited 288×
- State v. Gary M.B.Wisconsin Supreme Court· 2004-03-26· cited 62×
- State v. GudenschwagerWisconsin Supreme Court· 1995-03-22· cited 49×
- William Leach A/K/A William Martin v. Darrell Kolb, Acting Superintendent, and Attorney General of the State of WisconsinSeventh Circuit· 1990-08-24· cited 39×
- Isely v. Capuchin ProvinceE.D. Michigan· 1995-03-16· cited 39×
- State v. PankowCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1988-03-29· cited 37×
- State v. KingCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1996-09-30· cited 28×
- Christopher Kieninger v. Crown Equipment CorporationWisconsin Supreme Court· 2019-03-20· cited 19×
- State v. MasonSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2003-09-29· cited 14×
- State v. McIntoshCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1987-02-19· cited 13×
- State v. KnightWisconsin Supreme Court· 1988-04-14· cited 10×
- State v. Alijouwon T. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2021-05-27· cited 9×
- State v. Donald P. CoughlinWisconsin Supreme Court· 2022-06-21· cited 7×
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2006-01-24· cited 6×
- State v. KazeeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1995-02-07· cited 4×
- State v. WerleinCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1987-01-20· cited 4×
- Krantz v. Gehl Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1988-09-01· cited 2×
- Chaulk v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 1987-03-25· cited 1×
- Morgan v. KrenkeE.D. Wisconsin· 1999-11-17· cited 1×
- Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC v. HinkleyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2018-07-17· cited 1×
Cites
38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-06-17· cited 8,792×
- Engle v. IsaacSupreme Court· 1982-06-21· cited 3,714×
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court· 1981-06-17· cited 2,648×
- United States v. HastingSupreme Court· 1983-05-23· cited 1,999×
- Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1973-12-07· cited 1,232×
- United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1947-03-10· cited 463×
- State v. DyessWisconsin Supreme Court· 1985-06-28· cited 349×
- United States v. Maurice H. Friedman, United States of America v. Manuel JacobsNinth Circuit· 1971-07-16· cited 166×
- Paul Belton v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1967-09-28· cited 164×
- United States v. Bruce Lusk Bass, IIIFifth Circuit· 1974-03-11· cited 94×
- Carey v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1979-04-04· cited 72×
- Neylan v. VorwaldWisconsin Supreme Court· 1985-05-29· cited 66×
- United States v. Novia Turkette, Jr., United States of America v. John VargasFirst Circuit· 1980-09-23· cited 54×
- Robert Muench v. Thomas Israel and Attorney General of Wisconsin, Richard Worthing v. Thomas R. IsraelSeventh Circuit· 1983-08-15· cited 54×
- State v. BoothSupreme Court of Iowa· 1969-07-24· cited 45×
- United States v. James Orris Nettles and Emory Robinson, Jr.Fifth Circuit· 1978-03-31· cited 42×
- Johnson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court· 1978-10-03· cited 42×
- Kleinbart v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1981-01-30· cited 38×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.