Skip to main content

State v. Leach

Citations

  • 370 N.W.2d 240
  • 124 Wis. 2d 648
  • 1985 Wisc. LEXIS 2410

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding on de novo review that joinder was improper because the commonality between the cases was “insufficient to warrant the introduction of ‘other [acts]’ evidence”
  • juries may not be left to “speculat[e],” “conjecture,” or “theorize” as to an ultimate fact based on a “mere possibility” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Steinmetz, Abrahamson, Bablitch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.