Carey v. General Motors Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \expert testimony on the issue of causation does not help when it is based on speculation alone\
• “expert testimony on the issue of causation does not help when it is based on speculation alone”
• not erroneous for judge to instruct jury to \award the present value of a sum sufficient to compensate the plaintiff for future loss\
• not erroneous for judge to instruct jury to “award the present value of a sum sufficient to compensate the plaintiff for future loss”
• post-accident automobile recall letter admissible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).