Skip to main content
· 5/29/1985

Neylan v. Vorwald

Citations

  • 368 N.W.2d 648
  • 124 Wis. 2d 85
  • 1985 Wisc. LEXIS 2382

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that court has inherent power to control the judicial business before it
  • recognizing that court has inherent power to control the judicial business before it
  • holding that a trial court’s sua sponte dismissal orders were void due to a lack of “actual notice before entry”, which “precluded the opportunity to be heard”
  • “If there had been actual notice given of the dismissal, the plaintiffs’ counsel could have proceeded under [the statute] governing relief from judgments.”
  • \A void judgment may be expunged by a court at any time.\
  • due process requires notice and an opportunity to be heard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Steinmetz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.