Skip to main content

State v. Lawson

Citations

  • 2020 Ohio 3008

Syllabus

Trial court judgments convicting defendant following bench trial affirmed. Data obtained from a GPS device covertly attached to defendant's automobile pursuant to a search warrant was testimonial hearsay prepared for the primary purpose of accusing a targeted individual or for providing evidence in a criminal trial, and was therefore admitted by the trial court in violation of defendant's Sixth Amendment right to confront witnesses against him. Testimony of shooting victim and on-the-record statements by trial judge show that violation of Confrontation Clause was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt, and convictions were not against the manifest weight of the evidence.

Judges: Beatty Blunt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.