Skip to main content
Ohio Supreme Court· 12/31/2012

State v. Hood

Citations

  • 2012 Ohio 6208
  • 135 Ohio St. 3d 137
  • 984 N.E.2d 1057

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ‘‘[e]ven when cell-phone compa- nies, in response to a subpoena, prepare types of records that are not normally prepared for their custom- ers, those records still contain information that cell- phone companies keep in the ordinary course of their business’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pfeifer, O'Connor, Stratton, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, Kennedy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

64 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.