State v. Larue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• because of the HRE Rule 606(b) prohibition against receipt of evidence of jurors’ mental processes during deliberations, the supreme court concluded it was impossible to say beyond a reasonable doubt that a juror’s improper remark was harmless

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• State v. Furutani
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1994-04-27· cited 125×
• State v. Estrada
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1987-06-08· cited 106×
• Shirley Burton, Cross-Appellant v. Sharon Johnson, Cross-Appellee
  Tenth Circuit· 1991-11-01· cited 101×
• Gonzales v. Thomas
  Tenth Circuit· 1996-11-05· cited 87×
• State v. Mann
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 2002-01-11· cited 60×
• State v. Jackson
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1996-02-26· cited 59×
• State v. Levinson
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1990-07-16· cited 33×
• State v. Senteno
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1987-09-09· cited 31×
• In re Manriquez
  California Supreme Court· 2018-07-26· cited 26×
• State v. Sacoman
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1988-09-27· cited 25×
• State v. Bailey
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2012-03-22· cited 17×
• State v. Mabuti
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1991-03-21· cited 15×
• State v. Kim
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2003-12-30· cited 14×
• State v. Greyson
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1989-02-09· cited 11×
• Lopez v. Sears Roebuck and Co.
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1989-08-10· cited 9×
• State v. Sugiyama
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1990-05-18· cited 8×
• Stratis v. Pacific Ins. Co., Ltd.
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1987-06-10· cited 7×
• State v. Pichay
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1992-01-08· cited 4×
• United States Ex Rel. Hunley v. Godinez
  N.D. Illinois· 1992-01-27· cited 4×
• State v. Apao
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2000-05-03· cited 1×