State v. Mabuti

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a similar statement against interest implicating co-defendant and exculpating defendant was admissible under statute similar to NRS 51.345
• affirming a trial court’s denial of a motion for mistrial based on jury impartiality when, “on being asked by the court whether statements were made to the jury, concerning anonymous phone calls, the jurors gave no affirmative responses”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).