Skip to main content
· 7/7/1999

State v. Rocha-Ramos

Citations

  • 985 P.2d 217
  • 161 Or. App. 306
  • 1999 Ore. App. LEXIS 1254

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that, “[t]he trial court did not consider the issue of whether the officers’ observations constituted an exploitation of their illegal stop. On remand, the trial court must decide that issue and make the appropriate rulings that follow as a legal consequence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edmonds, Deits, Armstrong

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.