State v. Larrance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that because the trial court “ultimately decided the matter in reliance on [an] erroneous view of the law, the court abused its discretion[ ]”
• amended judgment entered pursuant to ruling on ORS 138.083 motion is appealable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re Marriage of Schwartz and Battini
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-04-03· cited 3×
• State v. Redmond
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-12-19· cited 1×
• State v. Dizick
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-04-26· cited 1×
• Anderson and Anderson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2026-02-19

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Rogers
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2000-05-04· cited 302×
• State v. Romero
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-08-18· cited 40×
• State v. Mitchell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-07-14· cited 15×
• Layton v. Hall
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-05-29· cited 13×
• State v. Stalder
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-04-19· cited 12×
• State v. Harding
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2009-12-17· cited 11×
• State v. Gutierrez
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-06-01· cited 10×
• State v. Pemberton
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-03-04· cited 10×
• State v. Wierson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-11-28· cited 9×
• State v. G. N.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-08-12· cited 7×
• State v. Harding
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-01-28· cited 6×
• State v. Newson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-03-12· cited 5×
• State v. Hall
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-05-08· cited 5×
• State v. Young
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-05-02· cited 4×
• State v. Engerseth
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-03-27· cited 4×
• State v. Lewallen
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-04-02· cited 4×