Court of Appeals of Oregon· 3/4/2009
State v. Pemberton
Citations
- 203 P.3d 326
- 226 Or. App. 285
- 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 118
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that, under Mayfield, the exercise of discretion based on a mistaken premise of law can be a failure to properly exercise discretion
- exercise of discretion based on mistaken premise of law can be failure to properly exercise discretion
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Edmonds, Presiding Judge, and Wollheim, Judge, and Sercombe, Judge
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. RomeroCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-08-18· cited 40×
- Lopez v. NoothCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-09-13· cited 18×
- State v. Parra-SanchezCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-03-22· cited 13×
- State v. LarranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-04-15· cited 4×
- Field v. MyrickCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-10-02· cited 3×
- Vasilash v. CainCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-11-14· cited 3×
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-03-04· cited 2×
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.