State v. Lewallen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• trial court has discretion to determine whether or not to correct a judgment under former ORS 138.083
• no abuse of discretion where the trial court’s decision relied, in part, on “appropriate concerns about finality” and “the age of the case” in rejecting defendant’s modification under ORS 138.083(1)(a)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Larrance
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-04-15· cited 4×
• State v. Brass
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-04-14· cited 2×
• State v. Redmond
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-12-19· cited 1×
• State v. Dizick
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-04-26· cited 1×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Blakely v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 13,994×
• State v. Rogers
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2000-05-04· cited 302×
• Sjomeling v. Lasser
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-07-11· cited 47×
• State v. Arnold
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-07-25· cited 13×
• State v. Harding
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2009-12-17· cited 11×
• State v. G. N.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-08-12· cited 7×
• State v. Harding
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-10-01· cited 6×
• State v. Harding
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-01-28· cited 6×
• State v. Engerseth
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-03-27· cited 4×