Skip to main content

State v. Lark

Citations

  • 2018 Ohio 4940

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in excluding a written statement from being introduced into evidence under Evid.R. 804(D)(3), as appellant failed to demonstrate that the author of the statement was unavailable as a witness, as contemplated by Evid.R. 804(A)(5). Furthermore, appellants convictions for aggravated possession of methamphetamine, aggravated possession of fentanyl, and possession of cocaine were supported by sufficient evidence and were not against the manifest weight of the evidence.

Judges: Hendrickson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.