Skip to main content
· 10/15/2018

State v. Gearhart

Citations

  • 2018 Ohio 4180

Syllabus

The trial court did not abuse its discretion by permitting a doctor to testify regarding the possible cause of one of the two victim's injuries rather than a probable cause of the victim's injuries since expert witnesses in criminal cases can testify in terms of possibility rather than in terms of a reasonable scientific certainty or probability. Appellant also did not receive ineffective assistance of counsel where counsel's decision whether to object to certain testimony was trial strategy that did not impact appellant's conviction given the overwhelming evidence of his guilt.

Judges: S. Powell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.