State v. Schils

Citations

• 2020 Ohio 2883

Syllabus

The evidence was sufficient to convict for criminal trespass, and the conviction was not against the manifest weight of the evidence because appellant did not have a grant of privilege to enter the victim's property, and assuming arguendo that the privilege was granted, he unnecessarily remained on the property for several moments. The evidence was also sufficient to convict for disorderly conduct, and not against the manifest weight of the evidence because, under the circumstances, appellant's words and conduct were likely to provoke violence.