State v. Venters
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 3111
Syllabus
Appellant's conviction for gross sexual imposition was supported by sufficient evidence and was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Appellant's actions in moving and restraining the victim's legs with his arm so that he could reach under her clothing to touch her pubic area was sufficient \force\ for the offense of gross sexual imposition. Appellant's 18-month prison term was not clearly and convincingly contrary to law.
Judges: Hendrickson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
- State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court· 1967-05-31· cited 7,146×
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. Jones (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-18· cited 926×
- State v. EskridgeOhio Supreme Court· 1988-07-20· cited 646×
- State v. AhlersOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-05-09· cited 107×
- State v. BakerOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-05-11· cited 38×
- State v. FoutsOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-03-16· cited 30×
- State v. WoodardOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-07-24· cited 19×
- State v. LarkOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-12-10· cited 18×
- In re A.P.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-09-12· cited 12×
- State v. UmphriesOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-10-01· cited 9×
- State v. Lopez-CruzOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-01-30· cited 7×
- State v. MooreOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-03-03· cited 5×
- State v. HaruyamaOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-11-28· cited 3×
- State v. WatsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-03-17· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.