Supreme Court of Vermont· 7/19/1985
State v. Lambert
Citations
- 499 A.2d 761
- 146 Vt. 142
- 1985 Vt. LEXIS 363
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- upholding stop based upon wife's hearsay report that defendant might be driving while intoxicated
- upholding stop based upon wife’s hearsay report that defendant might be driving while intoxicated
- “The State’s ultimate affirmative duty to establish the validity of a plea does not excuse defendant’s insufficient effort to come forward on his claim.”
- \The State's ultimate affirmative duty to establish the validity of a plea does not excuse defendant's insufficient effort to come forward on his claim.\
- passenger in parked car, suspected of public intoxication, could be ordered “to perform dexterity tests to determine whether there was probable cause to arrest for intoxication.”
- “The State’s ultimate affirmative duty to establish the validity of a plea does not excuse defendant’s insufficient effort to come forward on his claim.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Allen, Hill, Peck, Gibson, Hayes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. BoyeaSupreme Court of Vermont· 2000-12-01· cited 69×
- State Ex Rel. Taxation & Revenue Department Motor Vehicle Division v. Van RuitenNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1988-06-28· cited 37×
- State v. LambSupreme Court of Vermont· 1998-07-31· cited 37×
- State v. GraySupreme Court of Vermont· 1988-06-03· cited 35×
- State v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Vermont· 2002-04-12· cited 26×
- State v. RiefenstahlSupreme Court of Vermont· 2001-07-18· cited 21×
- State v. PaquetteSupreme Court of Vermont· 1989-06-16· cited 19×
- In re Nontestimonial Identification Order Directed to R.H.Supreme Court of Vermont· 2000-09-01· cited 17×
- State v. FordSupreme Court of Vermont· 2007-09-28· cited 16×
- State v. SchmittSupreme Court of Vermont· 1988-10-21· cited 15×
- State v. CrandallSupreme Court of Vermont· 1994-05-20· cited 13×
- State v. WelchSupreme Court of Vermont· 1994-10-14· cited 13×
- Commonwealth v. CanavanMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1996-07-03· cited 12×
- State v. LanoueSupreme Court of Vermont· 1991-01-25· cited 10×
- In Re RHSupreme Court of Vermont· 2000-09-01
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1969-06-02· cited 12,640×
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court· 1981-01-21· cited 5,975×
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1972-06-12· cited 5,118×
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court· 1984-07-02· cited 4,856×
- United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 3,736×
- Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court· 1962-04-30· cited 1,897×
- United States v. DunbarD. Connecticut· 1979-11-25· cited 43×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.