Skip to main content

State v. Kruse

Citations

  • 2017 Ohio 5667

Syllabus

The trial court did not abuse its discretion by restricting investigator funds provided to the defense Appellant's counsel was not ineffective plain error does not exist in the court's admission of hearsay statements that were found to be exceptions under Evid.R. 803(2) and Appellant's convictions were not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The convictions of the Appellant are affirmed.

Judges: Zimmerman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.