Ohio Court of Appeals· 12/28/2020
State v. Rupert
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 6893
Syllabus
Defendant's conviction was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. One isolated, improper statement by the prosecutor during closing argument regarding the testimony of the defendant did not prejudicially affect the substantial rights of the defendant when the jury was instructed that it alone was the decider of fact.
Judges: Willamowski
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 3,512×
- United States v. HastingSupreme Court· 1983-05-23· cited 1,999×
- State v. AwanOhio Supreme Court· 1986-02-19· cited 1,385×
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court· 1984-11-07· cited 1,321×
- State v. LandrumOhio Supreme Court· 1990-08-15· cited 737×
- State v. StevensOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-02-08· cited 41×
- State v. LilesOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-08-03· cited 24×
- State v. MoorerOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-02-25· cited 20×
- State v. KruseOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-07-03· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.