Court of Appeals of Oregon· 5/12/1999
State v. Knight
Citations
- 981 P.2d 819
- 160 Or. App. 395
- 1999 Ore. App. LEXIS 729
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the defendant’s actions constituted two discrete decisions to commit separate entries and therefore to commit two separate burglaries
- recognizing ORS 131.505(4) definition of “criminal episode” as appropriate to use in assessing whether convictions arise out of separate criminal episodes under Bucholz
- no abuse of discretion where the bases for the defendant’s motion for a continuance were “reasonably avoidable”
- a finding for Bucholz purposes requires finding described in ORS 131.505(4), which defines “separate criminal episode”
- “The phrase ‘same act or transaction’ is synonymous with the term ‘criminal episode.’ ” (citing State v. Boyd, 271 Or 558, 565-66, 533 P2d 795 (1975))
- no abuse of discretion where the bases for the defendant’s motion for a continuance were “reasonably avoidable”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Edmonds, Armstrong, Brewer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. YashinCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-05-18· cited 17×
- State v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-11-14· cited 13×
- State v. LicariCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-03-26· cited 10×
- State v. IsbellCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-12-26· cited 7×
- In re the Marriage of WestendorfCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-01-26· cited 5×
- Curry v. PalmateerNinth Circuit· 2003-04-16· cited 3×
- Welsh v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-03-15· cited 3×
- In re the Marriage of DicksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-04-23· cited 1×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1932-11-07· cited 4,979×
- State v. BoydOregon Supreme Court· 1975-04-01· cited 124×
- State v. MooreOregon Supreme Court· 1996-12-06· cited 72×
- State v. BucholzOregon Supreme Court· 1993-08-05· cited 67×
- State v. ParkerOregon Supreme Court· 1993-07-29· cited 55×
- State v. FarmerOregon Supreme Court· 1993-07-29· cited 46×
- State v. DoernCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-10-28· cited 25×
- State v. SealsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-07-01· cited 17×
- State v. HathawayCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-11-19· cited 15×
- State v. SparksCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-10-01· cited 13×
- Stranahan v. Fred Meyer, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-04-22· cited 13×
- State v. BeatyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-04-20· cited 8×
- State v. FlowerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-05-25· cited 2×
- State v. HurstCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-02-25· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.