State v. Licari

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, if the trial court’s deci- sion was within the range of legally permissible options, “we may not substitute our judgment for that of the trial court even if we might have resolved the issue differently”
• “Whether a denial of a continuance is improper depends on the particular circum- stances of the case and the reasons presented to the court at the time the request is denied.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Stull
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-10-19· cited 12×
• State v. Brockway
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-02-14· cited 7×
• Dep't of Human Servs. v. K. D. S. (In re C. D. S.)
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-06-06· cited 2×
• State v. Ringler
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-08-06· cited 2×
• State v. Hoffman
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-08-10· cited 2×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Rogers
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2000-05-04· cited 302×
• State v. Hickey
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-04-30· cited 29×
• State v. Wolfer
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1965-06-30· cited 27×
• State v. Hug
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-03-06· cited 19×
• State v. Knight
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-05-12· cited 12×
• State v. Dupree
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-12-15· cited 10×
• Nesbitt v. Myers
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2003-07-31· cited 6×
• State v. Burns
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-06-23· cited 4×