Aguiar v. Hawaii Housing Authority

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a plaintiff is entitled to a prede-privation hearing before being required to pay higher rent for low-cost public housing
• holding that “public housing is a variety of welfare subsidy the termination ... of which may jeopardize the economic survival of its recipients”
• holding that internal regulations, which set forth maximum income limits for continued occupancy by tenants in public housing and established a payment schedule, were rules
• holding that the plaintiffs’ interest in low-cost housing was a property interest “substantial enough to require agency hearings prior to the imposition of [rent] increases” (emphasis added)
• holding that amendments to the Master Management Resolution adopted by the Hawaii Housing Authority (HHA
• holding that amendments to the Master Management Resolution adopted by the Hawaii Housing Authority (HHA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).