Skip to main content

State v. Coleman

Citations

  • 257 P.3d 320
  • 292 Kan. 813
  • 2011 Kan. LEXIS 267

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “[w]hile the Samson Court found that California parole conditions allowed the police to conduct suspicionless searches of parolees, the Kansas Legislature and the Parole Board elected to place restrictions on parolee searches”
  • noting that “[w]hile the Samson Court found that California parole conditions allowed the police to conduct suspicionless searches of parolees, the Kansas Legislature and the Parole Board elected to place restrictions on parolee searches”
  • explaining that \an officer may expand the investigative detention beyond the purpose of the initial stop only if there is an objectively reasonable and articulable suspicion that criminal activity was or is taking place\
  • detaining a driver for even a few minutes in order for a K-9 unit to arrive will unconstitutionally extend the stop if the officer does not need additional time to ask exploratory questions or to process the traffic citation
  • \An officer may not arbitrarily detain a driver in order to procure a drug-sniffing dog . . . evidence seized as a result of [such an] unlawful arrest must be suppressed.\
  • \A traffic violation provides an objectively valid reason for conducting a traffic stop.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rosen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.