State v. King

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Although the trial court did not use the language of these cases, the court apparently was relying on the approach of the cases.”
• “particularly amenable to treatment in a probationary setting”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State of Minnesota v. Jose Arriage Soto, Jr.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2014-10-22· cited 135×
• State v. Sherwood
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1983-12-21· cited 14×
• State v. Malinski
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-08-14· cited 10×
• State v. Solomon
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-12-07· cited 8×
• State v. Dietz
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-02-17· cited 6×
• State v. Hanf
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2004-10-19· cited 5×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Garcia
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-02-13· cited 171×
• State v. Trog
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-08-17· cited 160×
• STATE, CTY. OF HENNEPIN v. McClay
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-10-06· cited 41×
• State v. Wright
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-09-22· cited 37×
• State v. Park
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-05-13· cited 27×
• State v. Hennessy
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-01-14· cited 17×
• State v. Clemmer
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-01-21· cited 8×