State v. Hennessy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the trial court’s stay of execution of the defendant’s presumptive sentence, notwithstanding the fact that “[t]he sentencing judge did not use the language that we used in Trog and Wright” regarding particular amenability to probation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State of Minnesota v. Jose Arriage Soto, Jr.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2014-10-22· cited 135×
• State v. Heywood
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-09-16· cited 50×
• State v. B.Y.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-04-24· cited 17×
• State v. Sejnoha
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1994-03-01· cited 13×
• State v. Malinski
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-08-14· cited 10×
• State v. Nelson
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-02-18· cited 9×
• State v. King
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-08-26· cited 8×
• State v. Pickett
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-01-25· cited 7×
• State v. Carter
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1988-06-07· cited 6×
• State v. Hanf
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2004-10-19· cited 5×
• State v. By
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-04-24
• State v. Boynton
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-04-22

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Trog
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-08-17· cited 160×
• State v. Wright
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-09-22· cited 37×