State v. Dietz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We have indicated in a number of cases that subjecting the victim to multiple types of penetration can be considered in determining whether there are aggravating circumstances present justifying a durational departure . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Rairdon v. State
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1996-12-12· cited 76×
• State of Minnesota v. Jacob Miles Solberg
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2016-07-27· cited 57×
• State v. Casady
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1986-08-26· cited 12×
• State v. Ahern
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-05-22· cited 6×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Trog
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-08-17· cited 160×
• State v. Cox
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-02-03· cited 82×
• State v. Van Gorden
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-11-24· cited 63×
• State v. Heywood
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-09-16· cited 50×
• State v. Brusven
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-12-30· cited 45×
• State v. Gardner
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-01-07· cited 43×
• State v. Moore
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-12-02· cited 37×
• State v. Schmit
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-01-28· cited 25×
• State v. Wellman
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-12-09· cited 22×
• State v. King
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-08-26· cited 8×