Skip to main content

Hernandez v. State

Citations

  • 905 P.2d 86
  • 127 Idaho 685
  • 1995 Ida. LEXIS 153

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying Strickland standard to petitioner’s claim that counsel’s failure to file petition for discretionary review with state Supreme Court constituted ineffective assistance of appellate counsel
  • A reviewing court will not address an issue raised only in the reply brief.
  • “We can see no legitimate basis for determining whether there has been a violation of the right to effective assistance of counsel guaranteed by I.C. § 19-852 differently from determining whether there has been a violation of a similar constitutional right.”
  • “We also do not address Hernandez’s claim premised on due process of law presented in support of his petition for review. We look to the initial brief on appeal, before the case was assigned to the Court of Appeals, for the issues presented on appeal.”
  • statutory right to counsel in discretionary state appeals

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson, McDevitt, Trout, Silax, Schroeder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.